As the world keeps changing and becoming more diverse, the legal industry has been under much pressure regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many organisations have developed and adopted DEI policies. Most organisations have faced slower than anticipated growth, with some projects even stagnating. One cause of this stagnation is the unwillingness to face and disclose unflattering DEI data. Nonetheless, sharing such data, regardless of how uncomfortable it may be, can strongly drive fundamental changes in the legal recruitment sector.
When law firms and/or recruitment agencies disclose their DEI data especially the more controversial ones, they invite the warring parties for all the negative impacts of their current stance. Such openness is essential because it highlights those areas that most need redress. By identifying gaps in recruitment, promotion, and remuneration processes, these firms clarify that business as usual will not be tolerated. Such simplicity usually acts as an alarm bell to internal and external stakeholders who often act on the matters highlighted in the statement.
Every time a DEI data report goes public, the firm, not only the employees who create it, becomes answerable to clients, rivals, and audiences. DEI data is viewed as a tool for reducing idiosyncratic risk in firms in the legal sector, which is extremely aggressive, and failure to adopt DEI initiatives may mean the firm losing clients to more ‘diverse’ firms. Especially with huge corporations as the firm's clients, it has increasingly been the case that legal service providers must be devoted to diversity, and the legal industry has faced similar changes. In this regard, any unfavourable outcome may incentivize the firm to employ better recruitment approaches like improving candidate diversity and using fair interview techniques/ procedures.
The firm also demonstrates a proportion of its progress in pursuing the DEI goals that it reports to its stakeholders. This transparency boosts the organisational spirit in that such attitudes embrace progress rather than simply directorate diversity geography. Companies that adopt that culture will also spend advertising dollars on recruiting specific groups, training targeted groups, and providing mentorship to the targeted group within the company. In the long run, these policies may improve the internal aspects of the company, in most cases due to changing the composition of the workforce.
There are already examples of causing major damage to legal recruitment industry DEI data by its usage, which focus on unfavourable details that have worked. For instance, some law practices have confessed to making less effort to promote women and ethnic minorities to partnership positions. In response, these firms instituted such measures as sponsorship programmes in which senior partners were appointed to promote the development of the career of disadvantaged lawyers, amongst others. Consequently, these firms recorded significant improvement in the representation of partners at the partner level, proving that, indeed, developments can be made by being open.
Further, double standards have been cited as one of the main reasons firms feel wary about exposing their DEI data. However, the benefits of transparency far outweigh the risks. Most importantly, if firms face their weaknesses, they can earn the respect and loyalty of workers and clients alike. Such loyalty is critical since it provides the groundwork for working together to address issues. Furthermore, companies that are open about their DEI issues have a better chance of attracting a wider variety of job applicants because people looking for jobs are now more selective and want to work for purposeful organisations.
Legal recruitment firms face complicated decisions when disseminating information around imprecise DEI data. Still, this is an action that they have to take. Being transparent in where and how the firm makes strides toward DEI initiatives makes everyone equally responsible and ensures progressive development, which is important for real change.
Suppose this approach is adopted in the legal recruitment industry. In that case, it will not only be able to respond and adapt to the present day’s global and multifaceted world, but it will also set forth definite ideas about what fairness and inclusion should look like in the workplace.
Copyright 2022 © Owen Reed Ltd.
